Peer Review Process

Step 1: Author:

Author Submits his/her research work to ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ by online submission on our website ( or by mail (

Step 2: Editor: 

All the articles are tested for format and checked for grammatical and formatting mistakes. Not more than 5 mistakes per page are allowed. All papers of the journal are double-blind reviewed by at least two reviewers, and ideally is double-blind reviewed by three or more reviewers

Step 3: Reviewer: 

Subject Experts will check your work & give the status:

  1. Accepted
  2. Rejected
  3.  Accepted with Minor Changes
  4. Accepted with Major Changes

Step 4: Author: 

If Manuscript is accepted then author have to send the Complete Manuscript, Online Maintenance Charges & Copyright form. The entire format can be downloaded from our website

Step 5: Editor: 

After completion of above mentioned process editor will send manuscript to publisher.

Step 6: Publisher: 

Publisher will publish the manuscript in current issue.

Step 7: Editor: 

Editor will inform to Author via E-Mail


‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ welcomes competent academicians to join us as editor/reviewer. Being an editor/reviewer is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ follows a strict set of guidelines while accepting the applicant as a editor/reviewer of ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’. The minimum set of qualifications for being a reviewer of ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ is listed below:

  • You should be a research author with at least a single ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ publication.
  • You should be an author with a minimum of a 5 publications in reputed journals.

Send your CV (Acadamic Curriculum vitae) it to with a brief bio-data for our internal purposes. ‘HISTORY OF KNOWLEDGE’ will revert back within 3 working days.